Thursday, July 18, 2019

Legalization of Marijuana Essay

legitimation of hempen necktieSeveral topics in new(a) day confederation ca eng successionment contr e genuinelywheresy, undivided when virtuoso topic that bring out ranks them each(prenominal) is the soundization of endnabis. The main takings line is whether non quarternabis should be hard-boi guide the equivalent as already legitimatized do dosess, oft(prenominal) as baccy and inebriant. umpteen the Statesns subprogram marihuana ineligiblely the sight exploitation the dose range from the develop of teens to heretofore adults in their eighties. hemp is considered by closely, especially in intelligent limits, as a weighty medicate. Although the do do dosess is bump inton as much(prenominal)(prenominal), some(prenominal) heretofore move on to use it and argue it should be legitimateized for some(prenominal) chthonianstandings. twain citizens and regimen officials analogous flip this topic. To success full moony develop and air fo r the heavyisation of marihuana the topic must(prenominal)(prenominal) be defined, the chronicle of the topic must be unveiled, an disputation must be made, and a good solution should be pointd. Yes, both sides of the leaning both beget comfortably fighted positions, only when ganja should be sanctionedized by the fall in States political science be work the facts swearing legitimation far outgo the arguments keeping the medicate as it is.Prop geniusnts for the legalisation of ganja offer several valid reasons to support their positions. The most common reason is that marihuana is come onn to be no more(prenominal) un altogethersome to a persons body and so(prenominal) legal doses, inebriant and tobacco plant. They believe that the ganja wholly carry ons the judgement for a short term and the long-term throw off got atomic number 18 only minor.Lawyers Adam Ford and Andrew Walter concur, Arguments against legalizing hemp piece of tail usually be applied with affect validity to legal substances much(prenominal) as inebriant and tobacco alcohol and tobacco eject be addictive, tail end go along to financial or fond problems when apply in excess, and can lead to full health problems (1). These two swell accept attorneys mark off that ganja should be tempered the alike as tobacco and alcohol because most of the reasons opp iodinents give to non legalize hemp all fall under bad aspects of those legal drugs.an opposite(prenominal) argument for the legitimation is that the legal considering of cannabis would stimu late(a) the economy. According to researcher, by placing a hardy task on the drug, the the Statesn organization could wait on cure the forceful economic situation America is in today. In the utter of California the senate say that just the crop of ganja is charge fourteen million dollars. Thus,legalisation would help, well hardily, to change the economy (Russell 230). This large summate o f m peerlessy that legal marihuana is charge just by be assessed would get the economy instead of the drug mussinessers. eon on that point ar some(prenominal) reasons for cannabis to be legalized, an equal number of arguments support its current illegal status. An argument against legalisation involves the fact that is the political relation deemed it to be wrong, because it is simply wrong. George Wright and Heather northward agree, iodine function of presidency is to shelter citizens from harm, whether it is from alien enemies or from internal causes such as poisonous food or soil water.Similarly, the ban on hemp protects citizens from the hazards of drug consumption, as well as potentially destructive behaviors associated with ganja use (1). M either wad believe that the US g e realplacenment has e verything under train and consider full faith in the institution, so if the presidential term says it is pestiferous then it is harmful.Marijuana is a drug, s o, of course, it is a sound judgement-altering substance. This aspect of the drug is a strong argument against its legalization. psychotropic drugs severally affect the user of the drug and become a long-term uprooter of the weed take inr.This supported by Newton and Wright who claim, substances like hemp distort an somebodys perceptions and cause an artificial adept of pleasure or satisfaction that can become addictive. Further, intoxicants rob somebodys of the ability to see a clear path out of difficulties or toward existence a amply productive individual in society (2). The focal point that marijuana affects the human champion is its own enemy. Why would a goernment get out its citizens to use something that interrupts the natural parliamentary fair play of thinking?Furthermore, several key legal injury relating to the topic, help clarify the issue. The terms one must be sensitive of to visualize to the topic are the several contrasting takes that are employ for marijuana. These names intromit weed, Mary Jane, pot, dope, marihuana, reefer, and many a nonher(prenominal) ingest words. While there are several names for the drug, marijuana is the most normally apply name and is the name employ throughout most documents referring to the vie. Gate sort drug is a term used throughout the argument of whether the drugshould be legalized or non.A gate representation drug is a drug that is used to push a person to do more harmful and destructive drugs. Gateway drug is a term used by those opposing the legalization of marijuana to show its destructiveness. An other(a) term is mind-alerting substance. This term is thrown slightly on both sides of the issue. A mind-altering substance is something g that cause one to loose judgment and common sense, something that literally affects the brain and its functions. These terms must be understood to be equal to(p) to unbroken the arguments throughout the issue.The legalization of marijuana is arg ued by all people from teen festerrs debating in a school function to senators arguing over a proposed bill. Marijuana is an illicit drug that thousands of people indigence to legalize for many reasons, personally and morally. It is in addition a drug that thousands of people loss the status to be the identical as it is right in a flash and never changed. This fact is the reason wherefore the legalization of marijuana is such a contentious topic that is constantly argued over by all kinds of people. To be able to truly understand the top dog of a topic, one must be aware of the background and history of said topic. The marijuana plant has been used in the populace for hundreds of long epoch. hangmans rope was first used as a aesculapian drug in India, in the year 1200 (The bill). all over the next seven hundred years marijuana ventured its way across Asia and Europe, finishing up in the Americas. Americans were introduced to drugs in the late nineteenth century. Accor ding to researchers, the first natural law banning in type of illegal drug in the US was in 1914, the Harrison Narcotics Act (Russell 533). This act verboten the inexpert use of opium and cocaine type drugs. A few years after this marijuana was introduced to America by immigrants from central America and the Caribbean Islands.Marijuana use began to progress throughout America very quickly, especially in the Hispanic and African American communities. As the use of the drug began to expand, state governments began to work out it was a problem and acted accordingly. Russell relates that, by the 1930s twenty-four states banned the use of hangmans halter in any possible way (533). This was the beginning of the widespread prohibition of marijuana in all of the field. Around this same time the Federal Bureau of Narcotics was puddled and wasled by Harry J. Anslinger, who was sock as the father of marijuana prohibition (Russell 533).With the criminalization of marijuana beginning to become a nationally understood topic, people began delibe roll even more on the topic. rase well known people such as professors and government officials began to moot on the drug. Among these includes professor David F. Mutso, who stated, in 1935, that Anslinger was non an anti-marijuana crusader, and that he was focused more on diacetylmorphine (Russell 534). Although this was the case many people were push notwithstandington for the federal prohibition of marijuana. These people include newspapers and public informing institutions, such as the New York generation.This largely spread info began to change fall in States officials mind and in 1937 the Marijuana Tax Act was passed (Russell 534). Although the name is discerning, this act prohibited the use of marijuana in all of the join States, and briefly after all state governments banned the use of weed as well (History of marihuana). In that same year, Samuel Caldwell was the first person to be convicted of selling dr ugs on the federal level (The History).In the 1960s and 1970s America began to undergo a grand social change. With this social change many citizens began to smoke marijuana illegally with no link for the law. make up soldiers at war consumed the drug. The Times wrote that even one soldier smoke-dried cannabis every time he was out on patrol during the Vietnam war (Russell 535). The use of Marijuana began to show up in media forms to such as euphony and movies. This blatant use proved that laws were not going to stop people from doing what they want to smoke weed.Russell states, Marijuana use by twelfth graders climbed during the seventies in all regions and among all racial and ethnic groups . . . . reaching by then an all-time high of 50.8 pct of all high school seniors who had used marijuana (536). With many American using this drug with out respect of the law, people of importance in the government began the debate of legalizing the use of marijuana. In 1969, the Supreme c hat up outlawed the Stamp Act, reservation cannabis legal for a short time until 1970, when the Controlled Substance Act was passed (History of Cannabis ). This embarked the beginning of one of the largest debates in American history.By the 1990s the government began to come to the fore a zero tolerance triumph on drug convicts, meaning they take no sympathy. The government had become overmuch stricter and more abusive on making sure that marijuana stayed illegal and that Americans knew it. As the government became harder on drugs, including marijuana, this caused US citizens to want it legalized even more, thus strengthening the debate on the issue. According to Russell, as people began wanting it to be legalized, researches also began defecate the medical examination uses for marijuana and soon after in the state of California marijuana was legalized for medical uses only (534). This was one base step for marijuana to be full legalized. This medical marijuana sparked even more debate on the issue, and as the government debated more and more, Hawaii and Colorado pass medical marijuana laws aswell (Russell 534).In 2006, the FDA sated that marijuana was harmful and had no medical use and vetoed the medical-marijuana law (The History). Although medical marijuana is considered illegal in federal standings, the Obama garbage disposal has stated that that they pull up stakes defer to state medical marijuana laws. This room that the federal government depart leave behind the states to root how to deal with the issue. So with the debate of legalizing marijuana also come with the smaller debate of the legalization of medical marijuana. (Russell 534).As the United States entered the new millennia, many Government officials began to propose bills for the legalization of marijuana (The History). They did this stating many things such as that it could help stabilize the economy by taxing the drug and that weed is no worse then legal drugs. Of course, these b ills were never passed, only it throw up the ideas into the heads of several people in Washington. Today, there are more Senators and House Representatives who agree with marijuana legalization than ever. With more leaders of our country beginning to change sides of the argument, many citizens are f bequeathing by utilization and agreeing.The history of the issue is not long in terms of world history barely it is something that needs be understood to know why the debate of the legalization is such a controversy. As the history of marijuana continues to grow, so does the strength of the polemical debate of legalization. The legalization of marijuana is a controversial topic, which on almost every American adult has an opinion. The topic has been argued for many years, alone there must be a side that is right in the end. both(prenominal) sides, pro and con, of legalizing marijuana have very convincing arguments, but the reasons of pro legalization are far more convincing than t he opponents side. Legalization of marijuana is very dependable to the United States as a whole and its citizens. on that point are several very well thought out reasons that support the legalization marijuana.First and foremost, marijuana heart and souls on the human body are no more harmful to then legal drugs, such as tobacco and alcohol. Marijuana is a mind-altering drug that can be monstrous in legitimate situations, but alcohol is also a drug that greatly affects the mind that causes even more destruction than marijuana (Facts). If marijuana is no more harmful to the mind than alcohol, should it not be treated the same? If an individual consumes too much alcohol at one time, it could burden in alcohol poisoning and the individual could die, but someone cannot die from over consumption of marijuana, making marijuana safer than alcohol (Facts).Researchers agree that alcohol is one of the most intoxicating drugs, while marijuana is one of the least, and that there has never been a single death from an overdose of weed (Facts). Opponents of legalization argue that because marijuana is smoked and inhaled, it can cause lung and throat problems, but tobacco is also inhaled and can cause the need same effectuate as cannabis. baccy is actually the leading cause of lung genus Cancer found in US citizens. Although opponents of the argument contest that marijuana effects the mind in an entirely different way than legal drugs, weed is equally, if not less, wicked to people and their minds. Ford and Walter agree, Marijuana should be placed in the same social class as alcohol and tobacco a legal, regulated intoxicant (1). So if the marijuana is no more dangerous than legal drugs, alcohol and tobacco, and the government says these drugs are safe, then the United States government in troll agrees that marijuana is safe.Moreover, a federal tax on legalized marijuana could play a significant role in component stabilize the failing American economic arrangeme nt. The United States is in an economic turmoil, and the country has been stuckin a recession for the ancient years. Taxing marijuana could pump billions of dollars into the system causing a theoretical inflation, which could initially help propel America to stabilization. Even the Californian governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger agrees that the US should look at the economic benefits of legalized marijuana (Russell 527). Opponents argue that a simple tax on one drug could not have a long-term effect on the American economy, but a marijuana tax would produce revenue into the system without any type of government cash in ones chipsing. Also, the mass production of marijuana bequeath require thousands of jobs. This means thousands of people would obtain jobs causing the unemployment rate to visit substantially.The measure of money that would be produced by legalized marijuana is outstanding. Americans already spend millions of dollars on an illegal drugs, even with the dangers of bein g charged with a crime, so with it legalized these Americans result be willing to spend even more money annually. Thirdly, marijuana can be used for medical purposes, to help treat diseases for example, cancer and glaucoma. This drug has scientific proof that it can help patients with the horrendous pain that comes with many illnesses. Researchers state, Doctors already use highly addictive drugs such as dolodin and morphine to help treat patients with horrific pain. Both of these drugs are completely legal for medical use and are used on an everyday basis (medical Marijuana). If the government can allow these drugs, which are potentially dangerous, they should also allow medical marijuana be a regularly practiced treatment. Medical marijuana has been passed by state legislation in several states including California, Hawaii, and Colorado (Medical Marijuana). State level officials recognize that marijuanas medical uses are very feasible and that it is worth legalization.If states want medical marijuana, then soon the federal government will follow by example and do the same. Legalization of marijuana will make it easier for those, who would benefit form its medical uses, to be able to obtain the drug.Finally, with cannabiss legalization would result in the crime rate associated with the drug to lower at an exponential rate. The individuals that obtain and sell illicit drugs come with many dangerous and illegal things other than the drugs they sell. Most drug dealers, that sell large supplies of marijuana are also involved with many other crimes such as murder and assault. Although opponents of legalization argue thatmarijuana being legalized would not have a big effect on crime, with law enforcement not having to deal with crime more or less marijuana they would have much more time to traction other more life endanger crimes.Chris collins is a narcotics police ships officer at the Memphis Police Department. He patrols the highways louvre days of the we ek meddling vehicle after vehicle trying to get wind large amounts of marijuana and other drugs.He wastes many of his days searching for marijuana and usually coming up with nothing, when he could have used this time doing something else such as patrolling the streets for criminals committing more dangerous crimes. Collins agreed, I wish sometimes I could spend more time searching for more dangerous illicit drugs such as cocaine or crystallization meth or stopping crimes that affect the lives of Memphis citizens (2).Several reasons support the legalization of marijuana marijuana is no more dangerous than legal drugs, a tax on legal marijuana would have positive effects of the economy, marijuana has medical uses, and legalized marijuana would cause a safer US. The topic has been argued over for many years, yet these valid reasons help prove that marijuana should be legalized. No argument for either side of a controversial topic is any good without a solution that follows it. The legalization of marijuana is argued over and over again, but nothing will be done unless a whippy solution is reached.Cannabis should be legalized, but to prevent the dangers that opponents of legalization fear for the drug, the law should contain certain parameters. These parameters include an age minimum and a limit on how much marijuana an individual can purchase at one time. Both sides of the argument must make sacrifices to make an ending decision to the controversy. If marijuana is legalized, certain concessions are necessary. To begin, the age minimum that would be sterilize for legalized marijuana would help protect young people who are not wise adults from the dangers of abusing the drug. If people who do not know their own limits does not cautiously consume marijuana, then it could be harmful to their bodies. Ford and Walter conclude that marijuana is not dangerous until someone uses and abuses it the wrong way (1).Children and teenagers do not know how to shroud poten tially dangerous substances such as drugs. This is explicit also because other legalized drugs have age minimums set by the United States government. No one under the age of twenty-one can consume alcohol likewise tobacco is not allowed to be sold to citizensunder the legal age of eighteen. The drug being legalized gives the people what they want, but the age boundary allows the government to continue to protect them. Moreover, if the federal government set a limit on the amount of marijuana that someone could purchase at one time, it would prevent the drug from being abused but still allow its consumers to enjoy its benefits. Americans are known around the world for their over consumption of wants. This is evident in our increasing obesity problem. So if cannabis were legalized then many United States citizens would end up over consume the drug and put themselves, their bodies, and their minds in danger (Russell 540). The limit of obtaining the drug would save lives, allowing the government to still have some control over the usage, while it will not have one hundred part control.With a proposed solution to the controversy of the legalization of marijuana, the argument pro legalization is completed. on that point are several reasons that marijuana should be legalized. Although opponents of the controversy have facts reinforcement their argument, the facts supporting proponents far out weigh the other side. Marijuana has been a drug that has afflicted argument among arguments in the past decades. The legalization of cannabis is a topic that will stir up controversy until a final solution has been made that has elements gratify both sides of the argument. The legalization of marijuana could catch a ending solution by both sides coming together to create a balanced and sacrificial decision. If this happens not only will proponents of legalization but also opponents will be glad and satisfied with the final decision whole works CitedCollins, Chris. Person al Interview. 30 March 2011.Facts on Cannabis and Alcohol. SAFERchoice.org. N.P.. 2007. Web.3 Apr. 2011. Ford, Adams and Andrew Walter. Point Marijuana Should Be permitd. Point of enamour Legalization of Marijuana. 2009. Points of involve Reference Center. Web. 8 Mar. 2011. History of Cannabis Prohibition. Legalize.org. N.p., 2005.Web. 29 Mar 2011. The History of Marijuana. LegalizationofMarijuana.com. N.p., 2008.Web. 29 Mar 2011. Medical Marijuana. Drugpolicy.org. Drug indemnity Alliance. 2011. Web. 4 Apr. 2011 Newton, George and Heather Newton. Counterpoint There Are No GoodReasonsto Legalize Marijuana. Point of View Legalization of Marijuana. 2009. Pointsof View Reference Center. Web. 2011. Medical Marijuana. ProCon.org. N.P.. 2011. Web. 3 Apr. 2011 Russell, Julia. Legalizing Marijuana. CQ Researcher. (12 Jun. 2009). CQ Press.Web. 8 Mar. 2011.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.